Quantcast

Buckeye Reporter

Sunday, April 28, 2024

ATF inspector halts firearm purchase over marijuana smell

Webp qucklbqx6n7i7gn0tucalengvc0m

Dean Rieck, Executive Director at Buckeye Firearms Association | LinkedIn

Dean Rieck, Executive Director at Buckeye Firearms Association | LinkedIn

A Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives industry operations investigator recently intervened in a firearm purchase in central Florida, citing concerns about the potential smell of marijuana. The incident occurred during a routine audit at a gun dealer's shop in Plant City.

The individual at the center of the incident, identified only as Daniel, had completed all required paperwork and background checks to purchase a handgun. However, the ATF inspector ordered the sale to be halted based on suspicions related to the smell of marijuana.

In response to the accusation, Daniel stated, "I wasn’t high... None of this makes any sense to me." The situation raises questions about the inspector's actions and the lack of clarity regarding the circumstances under which a firearm transfer can be halted by an ATF industry operations investigator.

Jason Medina, a spokesman for ATF's Tampa field office, acknowledged the possibility that Daniel could have been exposed to marijuana through various means, such as second-hand smoke or products like scented candles or perfumes. However, he declined to provide specific details about the inspector's training or the justification for stopping the sale.

Furthermore, there has been a lack of transparency from ATF officials regarding this incident. Despite inquiries, the agency has not addressed the specifics of the case, including the actions of the inspector involved. Aaron Gerber, the director of industry operations for ATF's Tampa field office, has not provided any comments on the matter.

This incident highlights concerns about the ATF's accountability and handling of firearm transactions, especially when it comes to potential violations of constitutional rights. The public's right to know about the conduct of ATF employees, who are funded by taxpayer dollars, is crucial in maintaining transparency and accountability within the agency.

In conclusion, the case of Daniel's halted firearm purchase serves as another example of the ATF's controversial practices and the need for clear guidelines and oversight in such situations.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS