Buckeye Reporter

The California-based nonprofit 97Percent has come under scrutiny for its purported anti-gun stance, despite its claims of bipartisanship and inclusionary goals. The organization, which took its name from a debunked poll about support for mandatory background checks, has been accused of masquerading as a centrist group while promoting anti-gun policies.

According to the article by Lee Williams, 97Percent's executive director, Olivia Troye, emphasized the importance of bringing gun owners into the conversation to work on reducing gun deaths across the country. However, an investigation by the Second Amendment Foundation revealed that 97Percent has supported various anti-gun measures, including bans on assault weapons and standard-capacity magazines, as well as expanded red-flag laws and mandatory permits for firearms.

Mark Oliva, public affairs director for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, criticized 97Percent, stating that the organization is deceiving the public by claiming to represent gun owners while advocating for bans on commonly owned firearms. Oliva emphasized that the group's true intentions are to restrict Second Amendment rights.

The article also highlights the composition of 97Percent's board, which includes individuals with a history of advocating for gun control measures. Despite its claims of representing gun owners, the organization's leadership has been described as radically anti-gun by critics.

In response to the scrutiny, Alan M. Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, expressed skepticism about 97Percent's intentions, stating that American gun owners are savvy enough to see through the organization's alleged gaslighting tactics.

In conclusion, the article raises doubts about 97Percent's commitment to gun owners and the Second Amendment, suggesting that the organization's true agenda may not align with its public image.