The Buckeye Institute appeals ruling over disputed municipal tax on settlement payment

Robert Alt President and Chief Executive Officer
Robert Alt President and Chief Executive Officer
0Comments

The Buckeye Institute has filed an appeal in the case of Kresevic v. Kimmel with Ohio’s Ninth District Court of Appeals, representing Karen Kresevic from Chagrin Falls. The organization argues that the city of Akron improperly taxed a settlement payment received by Kresevic, claiming the payment did not constitute wages or compensation for work performed.

Jay R. Carson, senior litigator at The Buckeye Institute and attorney for Kresevic, stated, “The city of Akron stretched the law to take a cut of Ms. Kresevic’s settlement in breach of its own tax ordinances and forms. This case allows the court of appeals to correct the trial court’s errors and rein in local governments’ illegal taxation.”

According to The Buckeye Institute’s appeal brief, the trial court incorrectly ruled that Kresevic filed her claim after the one-year statute of limitations had expired. While Akron asserts that this period began on June 14, 2022—the date Kresevic received her settlement—the Institute contends that under Akron’s tax ordinances and forms, it should have started when she filed her return.

The appeal also disputes the trial court’s conclusion that Kresevic voluntarily paid the tax because she requested a refund on Tax Day 2022 instead of when her employer withheld taxes from her settlement payment. For administrative reasons, Kresevic agreed to have her employer classify these payments as W2 “wages,” but maintains they were not earned through work performed within Akron as defined by municipal code.

Kresevic was employed as a physician assistant at Akron City Hospital during 2020 amid the pandemic. After pursuing a wrongful termination claim against her employer, she received a settlement which was subsequently taxed by Akron as income from work performed in the city. In April 2022, she sought a refund for municipal taxes withheld from this payment, arguing they were not wages nor earned within Akron city limits. On July 11, 2022, citing House Bill 197 passed by Ohio lawmakers, Akron denied her request and maintained that these payments constituted income for work done in Akron.

The initial lawsuit was filed in Summit County Court of Common Pleas. Further updates about this case are available at BuckeyeInstitute.org/KresevicvKimmel.



Related

Attorney General Dave Yost

Hyundai and Kia owners in Ohio offered anti-theft upgrades under multistate settlement

Ohio consumers who own or lease certain Hyundai or Kia vehicles may be eligible for compensation and free anti-theft protection as part of a multistate settlement, according to an announcement from Attorney General Dave Yost.

Rebecca C. Lutzko United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio

Federal grand jury indicts four men for illegal reentry in northern Ohio

Four individuals have been indicted by a federal grand jury in the Northern District of Ohio for illegal reentry after removal from the United States.

Attorney General Dave Yost

Ohio reaches $150 million settlement with Mercedes-Benz over diesel emissions violations

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has announced a multistate settlement totaling nearly $150 million with Mercedes-Benz USA and its parent company, Mercedes-Benz Group AG.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Buckeye Reporter.