Dean Rieck, Executive Director at Buckeye Firearms Association | LinkedIn
Dean Rieck, Executive Director at Buckeye Firearms Association | LinkedIn
The United Kingdom has implemented a ban on so-called "ninja swords," following the murder of a teenage boy, Ronan Kanda, who was killed by another teenager using a "ninja sword." Both the perpetrator and an accomplice have been convicted and sentenced to life in prison. This legislative move has sparked discussions about the UK's approach to weapon regulations, particularly those involving Japanese cultural artifacts.
The ban was reportedly inspired by a single, atypical crime. Critics argue that the term "ninja sword" is an invention of recent times, lacking historical context in both Japanese and British cultures. The UK has a list of prohibited weapons, many of which are items of Japanese origin, such as the kyoketsu shoge, kusari gama, and kusari-fundo. Shuriken, often associated with ninjas, is also banned, though katanas are not specifically prohibited if under a certain length.
The debate highlights the UK's broader approach to weapon bans, which some believe sensationalize and mischaracterize these items. The UK has previously modified cultural references, such as renaming the "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" to "Teenage Mutant Hero Turtles," and editing nunchaku scenes from films in the 1980s.
Japan, noted for its stringent weapon regulations, registers swords but does not ban them outright. There are over two million registered swords in Japan, which has not reported similar issues to those cited in the UK.
The effectiveness of such bans in preventing crime is debated. "The young thug who committed the murder that inspired this 'ninja sword' ban had no problem breaking the weapons carrying law — not to mention the law prohibiting murder," according to the National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action. It is suggested that the underlying causes of crime may need to be addressed rather than focusing solely on weapon bans.
This legislative decision by the UK raises questions about the potential cultural bias and the government's approach to addressing crime through weapon regulation.
###
Alerts Sign-up